Personal tools

Welcome to Debatepedia!

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 14:47, 13 October 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:52, 13 October 2011 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 73: Line 73:
*'''Featured portal: [[Global climate change debate portal|Climate change project]]''' *'''Featured portal: [[Global climate change debate portal|Climate change project]]'''
*'''[[:Category:Politics| Politics]] | [[:Category:Political systems| Political systems]] | [[:Category:International politics| International politics]]''' *'''[[:Category:Politics| Politics]] | [[:Category:Political systems| Political systems]] | [[:Category:International politics| International politics]]'''
-*'''[[:Category:Security| Security]] | [[:Category:Conflict| Conflict]] | [[:Category:War| War]] | [[:Category:Terrorism|Terrorism]]'''+*'''[[:Category:Security| Security]] | [[:Category:Conflict| Conflict]] | [[:Category:War| War]] | [[:Category:Terrorism|Terrorism]]'''[[Image:Earth.jpg|right|150px]]
*'''[[:Category:Morality| Morality]] | [[:Category:Religion| Religion]] | [[:Category:Life and death|Life and death]]''' *'''[[:Category:Morality| Morality]] | [[:Category:Religion| Religion]] | [[:Category:Life and death|Life and death]]'''
*'''[[:Category:Law| Law]] | [[:Category:Individual rights| Individual rights]] | [[:Category:Privacy|Privacy]] | [[:Category:Bans|Bans]]''' *'''[[:Category:Law| Law]] | [[:Category:Individual rights| Individual rights]] | [[:Category:Privacy|Privacy]] | [[:Category:Bans|Bans]]'''

Revision as of 14:52, 13 October 2011

Debatepedia is the Wikipedia of debates - an encyclopedia of pro and con arguments and quotes on critical issues. A project of the 501c3 non-profit International Debate Education Association (IDEA), Debatepedia utilizes the same wiki technology powering Wikipedia to centralize arguments and quotes found in editorials, op-eds, political statements, and books into comprehensive pro/con articles. This helps citizens and decision-makers better deliberate on the world's most important questions. Debatepedia is endorsed by the National Forensic League.

The Debate Digest

Our latest and best pro/con articles to help you develop a position on the world's most important issues.

Featured pro and con arguments from this article:

  • PRO: Obama did best possible to solve crisis with limited info/time. Steven Rattner. "Ron Suskind’s inaccurate revisionism." Politico. October 1, 2011:
    "amid all the titillating tidbits, let’s not forget the important substantive point: This new president was confronted with a set of economic challenges greater than any in more than 75 years. If he had known then everything that we know now about how the economic recovery would unfold, would he have made all the same decisions? Almost certainly not. But I firmly believe that dealing with the facts as they were known– not to mention the impossible politics of Congress – he got an exceptionally high percentage of the decisions right."[1]
  • CON: Obama has failed to grow the economy. Karl Rover. "Why Obama Is Likely to Lose in 2012." Wall Street Journal. June 22nd, 2011: "Unemployment is at 9.1%, with almost 14 million Americans out of work. Nearly half the jobless have been without work for more than six months. Mr. Obama promised much better, declaring that his February 2009 stimulus would cause unemployment to peak at 8% by the end of summer 2009 and drop to roughly 6.8% today.
    After boasting in June 2010 that "Our economy . . . is now growing at a good clip," he laughingly admitted last week, "Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected." The humor will be lost on most. In Wednesday's Bloomberg poll, Americans believe they are worse off than when Mr. Obama took office by a 44% to 34% margin. The last president re-elected with unemployment over 7.2% was FDR in 1936. Ronald Reagan overcame 7.2% unemployment because the rate was dropping dramatically (it had been over 10%) as the economy grew very rapidly in 1983 and 1984. Today, in contrast, the Federal Reserve says growth will be less than 3% this year and less than 3.8% next year, with unemployment between 7.8% and 8.2% by Election Day."
Recent Debate Digest articles

See Past Debate Digest topics

Debates In The News
  • Climate change and clean energy portal Probably one of Debatepedia's best resources, this portal is always a timely resource.
  • Debate: Constitutionality of US health insurance mandates The Obama Administration and others are pushing for a final ruling from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's mandate that Americans [with some exceptions] buy private health insurance.
  • Debate: UN recognition of Palestinian statehood is front and center in international news, as the Palestinian Authority pursues a high-profile UN vote in favor of statehood. A majority of UN member states appear to support their push. Yet, the US has promised to veto the move in the Security Council in support of its ally Israel.
  • Debate: American Jobs Act US President Obama submitted the American Jobs Act to Congress at a critical time in the nation's economic history. Debatepedia looks at the bill and the arguments from its supporters and detractors.

More Debates in the News

Editorial News and Notes

This section features strong work done by Debatepedia editors. Consider joining their efforts. User Guide.

  • Obama respects gun rights, but seeks background checks President Obama: "We must seek agreement on gun reforms." Arizona Daily Star. March 13th, 2011:
    "A man our Army rejected as unfit for service; a man one of our colleges deemed too unstable for studies; a man apparently bent on violence, was able to walk into a store and buy a gun. [...] I'm willing to bet that responsible, law-abiding gun owners agree that we should be able to keep an irresponsible, law-breaking few - dangerous criminals and fugitives, for example - from getting their hands on a gun in the first place. [...] First, we should begin by enforcing laws that are already on the books. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System is the filter that's supposed to stop the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. [...] Second, we should in fact reward the states that provide the best data - and therefore do the most to protect our citizens. Third, we should make the system faster and nimbler. We should provide an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing, and make sure that criminals can't escape it."

See Past editorial news and tasks | Follow recent edits and updates on Twitter | See other editing tasks you can do.

Category Browser

Browse through Debatepedia's main categories to explore its contents and areas of interest to you. Go to Debatepedia's Contents Guide to see all of its categories.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits