(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Not sure if you were just having trouble with the structure on this debate page, but it would appear that you were intentional deleting the entire "no" case, which would qualify as vandalism. I don't want to jump to conclusions though. Let me know. -- Brooks Lindsay 11:25, 23 November 2007 (CST)
Kyoto protocol structure issues
It's understandable that you had difficulties with the structure. We're taking strides to make things more clear as far as the table code that appears on editing windows.
Welcome to Debatepedia! You've joined a growing community of like minded thinkers. We encourage all new users to see the Debatepedia:Getting started (tutorial) -- Brooks Lindsay 20:54, 17 November 2007 (CST)