Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Market vs. regulatory approaches to cutting carbon emissions
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Market vs. regulatory approaches to cutting carbon emissionsThe following pages link to Debate: Market vs. regulatory approaches to cutting carbon emissions:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Debate:Carbon Emissions: Market vs. Regulatory Approaches (redirect page)
- Debate: Cap-and-trade versus carbon tax
- Argument: Carbon emissions regulations are effective and can be strengthened
- Argument: Carbon tax market mechanisms more effectively cut emissions
- Argument: Emissions markets are more economical than regulations
- Argument: A carbon tax is more economical than regulations
- Argument: Emissions standards can give unfair advantages to industries
- Argument: Efficiency standards are more popular than market approaches
- The People Speak: Global Debate Format
- The People Speak: Global Debate Translation Resources
- Category:The People Speak Global Debates
- Actors:Carbon Emissions, Cap-and-trade versus Carbon Tax
- Argument: A carbon tax helps reduce emissions in all industries
