Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Israeli military assault in Gaza
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Israeli military assault in GazaThe following pages link to Debate: Israeli military assault in Gaza:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Argument: Israel's response was disproportionate to the provocation by Hamas
- Debate: Israeli invasion of Gaza (redirect page)
- Upcoming features for the Debate Digest
- SEO
- Argument: Israel's assault on Gaza was an act of self-defense
- Argument: Gaza assault rightly preempts Hamas' existential threat to Israel
- Argument: Attacking Gaza distracts Israel from Iranian threat
- Argument: Israeli attacks on Gaza feed extremist resentment and terrorism
- Argument: Hamas invited invasion by refusing to extend the ceasefire
- Argument: Israeli assault was proportional to years of Hamas rocket terrorism
- Argument: Israel's attack of Gaza was not an act of last resort
- Argument: Israeli attacks embolden extremists on both sides in cycle of violence
- Argument: Israeli attacks in Gaza undermine peace process, long-term security
- Argument: Israel caused conflict by terrorizing Gaza with blockade
- Debate: Israel military assault in Gaza (redirect page)
- Argument: Israel air strikes in November, 2008 unraveled the ceasefire
- Argument: Israel killed an unacceptable number of civilians in Gaza
- Argument: Precision Israel attacks were never possible in crowded Gaza
- Argument: Israel failed its responsibilities as an occupier of Gaza
- Argument: Hamas caused blockade/conflict by adopting terrorism
- Argument: Israel is not an "occupier" and responsible for Gazans
- Argument: Defeating Hamas is key to long-term Israeli/Palestinian solution
- Argument: Blockade was legitimate defense, despite "occupier responsibility"
- Argument: Israeli attacks may force Hamas to accept a more durable ceasefire
- Argument: Israel's strikes have severely damaged Hamas, secured Israel
- Argument: Military strikes in Gaza re-establish Israeli deterrence
- Argument: Israeli offensive in Gaza combats Hamas-Iran ties
- Argument: Israel cannot be safe with a terrorist regime in Gaza
- Argument: Israeli strikes ignore history; no military solution with Palestinians
- Argument: Palestinians, not Israeli blockade, are to blame for failed Gaza economy
- Argument: Blockade was justly designed to cut off arm imports to Gaza
- Argument: Israeli assault may actually increase support for Hamas
- Argument: Israeli strikes were rightly measured to disable Hamas rocket attacks
- Argument: Israel cannot destroy Hamas and end rocket attacks by force
- Argument: Israel's right to self-defense does not justify mass murder
- Argument: Civilians were killed because Hamas locates rockets amid civilians
- Argument: Hamas was democratically elected; Israel must make peace with them
- Argument: Israel strikes military not civilians targets, unlike Hamas
- Argument: Israel has fewer deaths because of warning systems and hospitals
- Argument: Hamas was first to escalate conflict following end of ceasefire
- Argument: Hamas is not a "victim" of "excessive" Israeli force
- Argument: Israel need not work with the illegitimate Hamas regime
- Argument: Israeli precision strikes sought to minimize civilian deaths
- Argument: Hamas was never committed to ceasefire, consistently violating it
- Argument: Israel took action to minimize humanitarian crisis in Gaza
- Argument: Israel's assault in Gaza was an act of last resort
- Argument: Israel need not be "proportional" against Hamas terrorist attacks
- Argument: Would a proportional response from Israel include rocket attacks?
- Argument: Israel is legitimate in using full force to win war on Hamas
- Argument: Israel's Gaza assault was "aggression" not "self-defense" under i-law
- Debate: Israeli raid on Gaza flotilla
- Argument: Israeli assault on Hamas upholds liberty globally
- Argument: Hamas will easily rebuild from damage inflicted by Israel
- Argument: Israel's attack of Gaza was about approaching elections
- Argument: Proportional response from Israel only prolongs conflict
- Argument: Israel killed many times more civilians than Hamas
- Argument: Israel caused civilian suffering to create opposition to Hamas
- Argument: Israel strikes were intended to further dispirit Palestinians
- Argument: Undiscriminating rockets are only tools for Gazans to oppose Israel
- Argument: Israel put troops in harms way to minimize civilian casualties
