Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Fairness Doctrine
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Fairness DoctrineThe following pages link to Debate: Fairness Doctrine:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Featured Debate Digest articles
- User talk:Jonathan Winterfield
- Fairness Doctrine (redirect page)
- SEO
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine harms instead of protecting free speech
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine ignores sufficiency of modern media alternatives
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine falsely presumes "fairness" can be determined
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine does not require equal time for viewpoints
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine would counter conservative domination of radio
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine opens the door to government abuse
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine protects against odious views gaining legitimacy
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine is more a code of conduct than mandate
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine does not expose broadcasters to risk of litigation
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine rightly regulates free speech on public airwaves
- Argument: The Fairness Doctrine improves the public discourse
- Argument: Free speech requires boundaries, such as Fairness Doctrine
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine can benefit outrageous perspectives
- Argument: Balanced left/right broadcasting exist w/o Fairness Doctrine
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine does not censor; only ensures balance
- Argument: Popularity of conservative talk radio confirms its legitimacy
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine would destroy viability of conservative radio
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine actually stifles public debate
- Argument: Free speech without Fairness Doctrine can harm policy-making
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine helps advance free speech values
- Argument: Public can judge extreme viewpoints; Fairness Doctrine unnecessary
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine applies only to controversial broadcastings
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine wrongly sees "two sides" to every issue
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine remains important despite new media
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine counters corporate control of broadcasting
- Argument: Corporate broadcasters respond to diverse market demands
- Argument: Fairness Doctrine would open costly political battle
