Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Enhanced interrogation techniques
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Enhanced interrogation techniquesThe following pages link to Debate: Enhanced interrogation techniques:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Debate: Torture
- Debate: Waterboarding
- Argument: Waterboarding is a mild interrogation technique
- Argument: Waterboarding inflicts severe pain and suffering ("torture")
- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Editorial news and tasks
- Argument: The same info can be obtained by traditional interrogations
- Argument: Enhanced interrogation techniques amount to torture
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations are ineffective and unreliable
- Argument: Efficacy cannot justify inhumane/illegal enhanced interrogations
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations are cruel/immoral, even if not torture
- Argument: Verifying effectiveness of enhanced interrogations is too difficult
- Argument: Secret prisons with enhanced interrogations are immoral/illegal
- Argument: Waterboarding qualifies as torture
- Argument: "Enhanced interrogations" are similar to Nazi methods
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations are torture; not issue of "bad apples"
- Argument: "Enhanced interrogations" effectively obtain info, save lives
- Argument: Islamic terrorists can release info after reaching pain threshold
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations foment anti-Americanism and terrorism
- Argument: Terrorists' methods do not justify enhanced interrogations
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations undermine America's moral legitimacy
- Argument: President has sole discretion to interpret i-law during war
- Argument: US President has sole discretion on enhanced interrogations
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations do not violate US due process laws
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations do not violate "cruel and unusual" laws
- Argument: US prosecuted foreign governments for waterboarding
- Argument: US has condemned "enhanced interrogations" abroad
- Argument: Winning trust of prisoners is more effective than harsh interrogations
- Argument: President can suspend habeas corpus in war; enemy combatants OK
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations are necessary in ticking time bomb scenario
- User talk:Sfcmac
- User:Sfmac
- Argument: Claims about effectiveness of enhanced interrogations are dubious
- User:Neopergoss
- User talk:Neopergoss
- Debatepedia top 25 pro/con articles
- User talk:Thedurbinator
- Argument: Army Field Manual won't meet interrogation needs
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations delegitimize practice of interrogation
- Argument: Traditional interrogations don't work with radical terrorists
- Argument: Americans won't tolerate lost lives for political correctness
- Argument: Majority of Americans believe harsh interrogations justified
- Argument: Enhanced interrogations unnecessary; Army Field Manual is sufficient
- Argument: Bush wrongly created own definition of torture
- Argument: Enhanced interrogation techniques are unconstitutional
- Argument: US Constitution does not apply to enemy combatants
- Debates in the News
