Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Charter schools
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Charter schoolsThe following pages link to Debate: Charter schools:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Featured Debate Digest articles
- Debate: Crime cameras
- Argument: Charter schools perform no better than public schools
- Argument: Charter schools are performing better than public schools
- Argument: Charter schools can generate strong funding from foundations
- Argument: Disadvantaged can afford publicly-funded charter schools
- Argument: Charter schools spur competition that forces all schools to improve
- Argument: Flexibility of charter schools can better serve disadvantaged
- Argument: Competition b/w teachers in charter schools incentivizes performance
- Argument: The mission focus of charter schools helps promote success
- Argument: Charter schools have a poor return on investment
- Argument: Charter schools are damaging private schools
- Argument: Charter schools create two-tiers; lets public schools fail
- Argument: Charter schools fragment society with scattered education values
- Argument: Competition created by charter schools distracts from the classroom
- Argument: Charter schools are unaccountable and dictatorial
- Argument: Schools are not like businesses; can't just let bad ones die
- Argument: Funded charter schools are not in open market competition
- Argument: Charter schools can destroy valuable neighborhood schools
- Argument: Charter schools exploited aftermath of Katrina in New Orleans
- Argument: Katrina allowed New Orleans to restart with charter schools
- Argument: Adaptive charter schools can make necessary changes
- Argument: Charter schools focus more on behavior and self-esteem
- Argument: Charter schools stimulate competition to enroll students
- Argument: Charter schools compete with and threaten public schools
- Argument: Public schools are cushioned from enrollment losses to charter schools
- Argument: Charter schools actively resist teacher unionization
- Argument: Charter schools are a type of public school for public benefit
- Argument: Charter schools offer parents choices in public schools
- Argument: New Orleans should not be experimented on with charter schools
- Debate: Big government
- Argument: Charter schools proliferated too quickly to monitor
- Argument: Charter school administrators can hand-pick the best teachers
- Argument: Charter school competition distracts from teaching
- Argument: Charter schools promote teacher independence and character
- Argument: Charter schools spend more on administration
- Argument: Different policies in every charter school creates confusion
- Argument: Public schools can offer everything charter schools claim
- Argument: Many factors constrain "choice" introduced by charter schools
- Argument: Charter schools are based on funding students not schools
- Argument: Charter schools can unconventionally reward student success
- Argument: Charter school choice helps pressure school boards to reform
- Argument: Entrepreneurs exploit corrupt officials to create charter schools
- Argument: Regulations restrict charter schools and their competitiveness
- Argument: Charter schools offer fewer services, reducing operating costs
- Argument: Charter schools contribute to damaging privatization of schools
- Argument: Charter schools don't add efficiency, but more administrative costs
- Argument: Charter schools, free from regulation, are innovative
- Argument: Charter schools do not achieve economies of scale
- Argument: Agile charter schools can quickly respond to meet demand
