Portal:Asian Parliamentary Debate
|Revision as of 08:51, 27 July 2008 (edit)
Alex.dukalskis (Talk | contribs)
← Previous diff
|Revision as of 10:14, 27 July 2008 (edit)
Kye Hanafiah (Talk | contribs)
Next diff →
|Line 21:||Line 21:|
|-||''Prime Minister''||+||''Prime Minister (PM)''|
|* Define context and parameters of debate. For example, in an open motion like "This House Would Support Musicians", the debate could be contextualized into whether music should be a commodity for trade, or it should be available gratis (i.e. free music download and transfer)||* Define context and parameters of debate. For example, in an open motion like "This House Would Support Musicians", the debate could be contextualized into whether music should be a commodity for trade, or it should be available gratis (i.e. free music download and transfer)|
|*Provide concise background or history leading to the issue||*Provide concise background or history leading to the issue|
|-||*Give framework of government bench's case. I.e. mechanisms (if any), argumentation flow (what PM argument is, what DPM will talk about)||+||*Give framework of government bench's case. I.e. mechanisms (if any), argumentation flow (what the government's first argument is and what the Deputy Prime Minister will talk about)|
|*Introduce 1st argument||*Introduce 1st argument|
|*Assert Government stand||*Assert Government stand|
|-||''Deputy Prime Minister''||+||''Deputy Prime Minister (DPM)''|
|* Rebut first argument from Leader of Opposition||* Rebut first argument from Leader of Opposition|
|Line 44:||Line 44:|
|* Provide a deeper level of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals||* Provide a deeper level of analysis for previous arguments and rebuttals|
|* No new arguments, but new angles of arguments should be given||* No new arguments, but new angles of arguments should be given|
|+||* Brief summary of entire case of Government|
|* Reassert Government stand and case||* Reassert Government stand and case|
Revision as of 10:14, 27 July 2008
Asian Parliamentary Debate is a debate format, similar to American Parliamentary Debate, in which two teams of three compete in each match.
Prime Minister (PM)
Leader of Opposition
Most importantly, try to have fun while you're doing all this. ;)
Even just skimming a few international news websites, like BBC news, Al Jazeera or The New York Times will help keep you abreast of international issues. If you have a computer, set one of these sites as your homepage so that global issues "sink in" each time you open your browser. A great weekly read for sheer breadth is the The Economist.
Research Timely Issues
If there is an issue that is dominating the news and you have a debate tournament coming up, you can be sure that there will be a motion on that topic. Split tasks with your partners and teammates and create briefs on these issues before the tournament so that everyone can be up to speed. Keep these briefs throughout the year so that you can update them as events change.
Research Key Countries and Organizations
Some countries are global players and will enter nearly any international debate in which you find yourself. Being even passingly familiar with the political structures and current situations of these countries - or groups of countries - can help you win debates. Some good countries to start with are: China, the US, Russia, the EU and Japan. International organizations, especially the UN, feature prominently in many debates as well. Knowing the decision-making machinery of these organizations, their jurisdiction and their activities will help you immensely. In addition to the UN, you may want to look into NATO, ASEAN, the WTO and the G8.
Use IDEA's Free Resources
Debatepedia (the wiki you are on right now) is a free resource open to anyone with internet access. It is a great place to get a sense of an issue and begin constructing arguments. You may want to dig deeper into important events and controversies, but with thousands of articles, Debatepedia is a good place to start.
In Asian Style, there are 2 teams - Government and Opposition. Each team has 3 members and each team gives 4 speeches. The format is a limited preparation format, meaning that the topic is announced, depending on the tournament, roughly 30 minutes before the debate.
The 3 members of the Government should defend the motion. The 3 members of the team, each of which gives a 7 minute speech, are:
One speaker from the Government team - either the Prime Minister or Deputy Prime Minister - is charged with giving a 4 minute reply speech that clarifies the debate from the Government perspective without bringing forth new arguments.
The 3 members of the Opposition team should negate the motion and refute arguments brought forth by the Government. The 3 members of the team, each of which gives a 7 minute speech, are:
Like the Government team, one speaker from the Opposition team - either the Leader of Opposition or Deputy Leader of Opposition - is charged with giving a 4 minute reply speech that clarifies the debate from the Opposition perspective without bringing forth new arguments.
In the 7 minute speeches, the opposing team can stand up and ask for Points of Information (POI) after the first minute and until the sixth minute. A POI should be a brief question or comment and not a long-winded monologue or back and forth cross examination session.
Varsity Club and Society Pages