Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: THBT water privatization in Africa is good.

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:51, 17 July 2008 (edit)
Madi (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 18:52, 17 July 2008 (edit)
Madi (Talk | contribs)
(Yes)
Next diff →
Line 57: Line 57:
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+When the company has redeemed municipal water supply at the state, it cares of that that water which it will sell, corresponded to sanitary norms. In it the companies will be interested all, and that will have to pay the considerable penalty. The similar situation has occured in Puerto Rico where the state, having proved that fact, that the private company negligently concerns to the responsibilities and cares only of thickness of the purse, has brought an action and has carried case, having received thus a round sum at a rate of 6.2 million American dollars. Other companies have taken this case on a note, and somebody from them will want to repeat that bitter experience. And as support of privatization and argument about sanitary position it is possible to give an example the USA where before privatization 41 all potable water mismatched sanitary norms. In a year after carrying out of privatization all water began to answer all norms. As you can see, dear ladies and gentlemen, privatization will bring in the countries of Africa still and improvement of quality of water. We do a conclusion: unlike the state, private The companies can improve quality of water and stabilize sanitary position. And it, in turn, will improve health of people. According to the CART, 80 all illnesses are connected with quality of potable water. Hence, the account already 2-0 in favour of privatization.
Line 67: Line 67:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====No==== ====No====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''

Revision as of 18:52, 17 July 2008

Write debate main question here...

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Hello, dear ladies and gentlemen!? “From all crises of any origin crisis of water resources brings an attention to the question on a survival of the Earth” - so the general director of UNESCO Koitsiro Matsuura has told. And it is valid so. Water is a source of a life on the Earth. Fresh water on a planet only 2%, and pure and suitable to the use? In general scanty quantity. daily 30 thousand people die of the illnesses caused by bad quality of potable water, and in some places because of its absence. We talk about such place of our blue sphere in our case. It will be a question of process of privatization of water resources in Africa. 2\3 of all water resources on a planet for today are in a state ownership. That to the state to solve a problem of maintenance of the population water, the round sum of money is necessary to it. For example, we shall take the country which enters into the seven of the most developed countries of the world? Canada where to improve a condition of water, 49 billion canadian dollars only on reconstruction of system of water supply was required. And 41 billion canadian dollars more on construction of a new infrastructure. At the state of such money is not present. In Canada the problem has been solved by means of the private companies. And now let's present for a moment, what means are required for improvement of a situation in Africa. Naturally, at the African states of such transcendental sums is not present. And a unique output from the developed situation? It is privatization of water resources of Africa. And consequently our command takes of a position completely supporting process of privatization of water resources in today's game. We approve, what? Municipal water supply by the private companies more effectively, than management of the state and local authorities?. And now we shall put forward 4 arguments completely justifying our choice.

Argument 1. If to transfer municipal water supply in Hands of the private companies water supply in the countries of Africa will be adjusted.

Yes

And it will promote improvement of health of the nation. Let's present such situation. In any African country municipal water supply takes over the private companies. They adjust water supply and water delivery to all inhabitants of this country. The companies cares of that this water corresponded to norms that it was pure and it was suitable for the use. And after build all new infrastructure which in Africa practically is not present. Similar experience possess Chile and Argentina, Gabon and Cambodia, Guinea. Privatization in these countries has rescueed lives to millions people. We do a conclusion: unlike the state, the private companies can provide access to potable water for people in Africa. And it means, that account 1-0 in favour of privatization.





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Argument 2. Quality of water and sanitary position in the countries of Africa where privatization will be lead will improve

Yes

When the company has redeemed municipal water supply at the state, it cares of that that water which it will sell, corresponded to sanitary norms. In it the companies will be interested all, and that will have to pay the considerable penalty. The similar situation has occured in Puerto Rico where the state, having proved that fact, that the private company negligently concerns to the responsibilities and cares only of thickness of the purse, has brought an action and has carried case, having received thus a round sum at a rate of 6.2 million American dollars. Other companies have taken this case on a note, and somebody from them will want to repeat that bitter experience. And as support of privatization and argument about sanitary position it is possible to give an example the USA where before privatization 41 all potable water mismatched sanitary norms. In a year after carrying out of privatization all water began to answer all norms. As you can see, dear ladies and gentlemen, privatization will bring in the countries of Africa still and improvement of quality of water. We do a conclusion: unlike the state, private The companies can improve quality of water and stabilize sanitary position. And it, in turn, will improve health of people. According to the CART, 80 all illnesses are connected with quality of potable water. Hence, the account already 2-0 in favour of privatization.





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Argument 3. It will be favourable to the states and the companies from the economic point of view.

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.