Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: THBT water privatization in Africa is good.

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:46, 17 July 2008 (edit)
Madi (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 18:47, 17 July 2008 (edit)
Madi (Talk | contribs)
(Background and Context of Debate:)
Next diff →
Line 14: Line 14:
===Background and Context of Debate:=== ===Background and Context of Debate:===
 +Hello, dear ladies and gentlemen!?
 +“From all crises of any origin crisis of water resources brings an attention to the question on a survival of the Earth” - so the general director of UNESCO Koitsiro Matsuura has told. And it is valid so. Water is a source of a life on the Earth. Fresh water on a planet only 2%, and pure and suitable to the use? In general scanty quantity. daily 30 thousand people die of the illnesses caused by bad quality of potable water, and in some places because of its absence. We talk about such place of our blue sphere in our case. It will be a question of process of privatization of water resources in Africa.
 + 2\3 of all water resources on a planet for today are in a state ownership. That to the state to solve a problem of maintenance of the population water, the round sum of money is necessary to it. For example, we shall take the country which enters into the seven of the most developed countries of the world? Canada where to improve a condition of water, 49 billion canadian dollars only on reconstruction of system of water supply was required. And 41 billion canadian dollars more on construction of a new infrastructure. At the state of such money is not present. In Canada the problem has been solved by means of the private companies. And now let's present for a moment, what means are required for improvement of a situation in Africa. Naturally, at the African states of such transcendental sums is not present. And a unique output from the developed situation? It is privatization of water resources of Africa. And consequently our command takes of a position completely supporting process of privatization of water resources in today's game. We approve, what? Municipal water supply by the private companies more effectively, than management of the state and local authorities?. And now we shall put forward 4 arguments completely justifying our choice.
|} |}
Line 22: Line 25:
|- |-
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===

Revision as of 18:47, 17 July 2008

Write debate main question here...

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Hello, dear ladies and gentlemen!? “From all crises of any origin crisis of water resources brings an attention to the question on a survival of the Earth” - so the general director of UNESCO Koitsiro Matsuura has told. And it is valid so. Water is a source of a life on the Earth. Fresh water on a planet only 2%, and pure and suitable to the use? In general scanty quantity. daily 30 thousand people die of the illnesses caused by bad quality of potable water, and in some places because of its absence. We talk about such place of our blue sphere in our case. It will be a question of process of privatization of water resources in Africa.

2\3 of all water resources on a planet for today are in a state ownership. That to the state to solve a problem of maintenance of the population water, the round sum of money is necessary to it. For example, we shall take the country which enters into the seven of the most developed countries of the world? Canada where to improve a condition of water, 49 billion canadian dollars only on reconstruction of system of water supply was required. And 41 billion canadian dollars more on construction of a new infrastructure. At the state of such money is not present. In Canada the problem has been solved by means of the private companies. And now let's present for a moment, what means are required for improvement of a situation in Africa. Naturally, at the African states of such transcendental sums is not present. And a unique output from the developed situation? It is privatization of water resources of Africa. And consequently our command takes of a position completely supporting process of privatization of water resources in today's game. We approve, what? Municipal water supply by the private companies more effectively, than management of the state and local authorities?. And now we shall put forward 4 arguments completely justifying our choice. 

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.