Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Society should outlaw very harmful activities

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:04, 24 September 2011 (edit)
Myclob (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:04, 25 September 2011 (edit)
Myclob (Talk | contribs)

Next diff →
Line 37: Line 37:
* Total: +4 * Total: +4
 +|}
 +==[[Alternative ways of saying the same thing]]==
 +
 +## Assumption: [[Society should regulate activities that it feels are harmful|Society should regulate activities that it feels are harmful]].
-|} 
[[Category:Law]] [[Category:Law]]

Revision as of 01:04, 25 September 2011

Reasons to agree

  1. Yes, society has a right to protect people's freedoms, but government has also been hired to protect people from other people.
  2. Government has an interest in our people not destroying themselves. Governments can increase their countries power if they improve the overall and per capita health and education of their citizens. Some governments are better than other governments. Good governments support human rights, freedom of the press, protection of the environment, the rule of law. Good governments need more power to compete against bad governments.

Reasons to disagree

Interest, values, and assumptions of those who agree


Interest & Values of those who disagree

Movies That Agree

Parent debate

Score

  • Reasons to agree: +4
  • Reasons to disagree: -0
  • Reasons to agree with reasons to agree: +0
  • Reasons to disagree with reason to agree: 0
  • Reasons to agree with reasons to disagree: -0
  • Reasons to disagree with reasons to disagree: 0
  • Total: +4

Alternative ways of saying the same thing

    1. Assumption: Society should regulate activities that it feels are harmful.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.