Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Secularism

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11:40, 19 April 2011 (edit)
England4ever (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:49, 9 June 2011) (edit)
England4ever (Talk | contribs)
(Con)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Should the Church be involved in politics?===
|- |-
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-*'''Church involvement in politics violates separation from State.''' It is important that a separation between Church and State be maintained. This is key to the maintenance of neutral and secular society, where no particular religious view becomes endorsed by the state, at a cost to other, possibly clashing religious views. Church's should respect this principle and subsequently separate themselves from the politics of the state.+ 
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Pro" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
Line 34: Line 34:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Should governments be religiously neutral?===
|- |-
Line 52: Line 52:
====Con==== ====Con====
-*Enforcing secularism creates an artificial stalemate between religions, barring any evidence that proves a religion or a popular enough irreligious worldview to be either true, false, or unethical from the mainstream media and curriculum however valid it may be, all for the sake of causing no offence. Or even worse, the government makes one scapegoat belief (usually the country's traditional historic religion) and elevates the others at its expense. It would be impossible to have a truly neutral government as this would only annoy all the religions. But picking on the national traditional religion compromises and can potentially threaten a national identity. +*'''Enforcing secularism creates an artificial stalemate between religions,''' barring any evidence that proves a religion or a popular enough irreligious worldview to be either true, false, or unethical from the mainstream media and curriculum however valid it may be, all for the sake of causing no offence. Or even worse, the government makes one scapegoat belief (usually the country's traditional historic religion) and elevates the others at its expense. It would be impossible to have a truly neutral government as this would only annoy all the religions. But picking on the national traditional religion compromises and can potentially threaten a national identity.
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+
- +
 +*'''Separation of religion and politics is undemocratic.''' Restricting the influence of religion on politics can potentially lead to cases where numbers are overlooked and minorities are over-favoured.
Line 64: Line 63:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Does Secularism cause social evils?===
|- |-
Line 82: Line 81:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' 
- 
 +*'''Secularism endorses political correctness,''' which just about everyone hates, in order to enforce a stalemate between religions.
Line 93: Line 91:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- 
==See also== ==See also==
==External links and resources== ==External links and resources==

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Is a secular state superior to a religious one?

Background and context

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Should the Church be involved in politics?

[Add New]

Pro

[Add New]

Con

  • What use is a church that stands back and looks on? State laws can sometimes be anti-human. For example: the Nuremberg laws in Nazi Germany, numerous laws in Soviet Russia, or currently in North Korea Is it not the duty of major church organizations to oppose such laws?


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Should governments be religiously neutral?

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

  • Enforcing secularism creates an artificial stalemate between religions, barring any evidence that proves a religion or a popular enough irreligious worldview to be either true, false, or unethical from the mainstream media and curriculum however valid it may be, all for the sake of causing no offence. Or even worse, the government makes one scapegoat belief (usually the country's traditional historic religion) and elevates the others at its expense. It would be impossible to have a truly neutral government as this would only annoy all the religions. But picking on the national traditional religion compromises and can potentially threaten a national identity.


  • Separation of religion and politics is undemocratic. Restricting the influence of religion on politics can potentially lead to cases where numbers are overlooked and minorities are over-favoured.



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Does Secularism cause social evils?

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

  • Secularism endorses political correctness, which just about everyone hates, in order to enforce a stalemate between religions.




See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.