Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: S&P downgrade of U.S. debt

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 15:16, 8 August 2011 (edit)
Ifisher18 (Talk | contribs)
(Background and Context of Debate:)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:24, 8 August 2011) (edit)
Ifisher18 (Talk | contribs)
(References:)
 
Line 114: Line 114:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+*[[Debate: US debt ceiling deal]]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+*[[Debate: Balanced budget amendment to US Constitution]]
 +*[[Debate: Obama executive order to raise the debt ceiling]]
===Related pages on Debatepedia:=== ===Related pages on Debatepedia:===
|- |-

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Was S&P's downgrade of U.S. debt from AAA to AA+ justified?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Standard & Poor’s removed the United States government from its list of risk-free borrowers for the first time on August 5, 2011, a downgrade that is freighted with symbolic significance but carries few clear financial implications. The company, one of three major agencies that offer advice to investors in debt securities, said it was cutting its rating of long-term federal debt to AA+, one notch below the top grade of AAA. It described the decision as a judgment about the nation’s leaders, writing that “the gulf between the political parties” had reduced its confidence in the government’s ability to manage its finances. The Obama administration reacted with indignation, noting that the company had made a significant mathematical mistake in a document that it provided to the Treasury Department on August 5, overstating the federal debt by about $2 trillion. The downgrade could lead investors to demand higher interest rates from the federal government and other borrowers, raising costs for governments, businesses and home buyers. But many analysts say the impact could be modest, in part because the other ratings agencies, Moody’s and Fitch, have decided not to downgrade the government at this time. The debate below will focus on whether or not Standard & Poor's downgrade of the U.S. debt was justified.

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





See also

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.