Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Pentagon deconstruction

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 02:17, 28 August 2011; Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This house believes that the Pentagon building should be demolished

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Does it makes any sense that that building still stands?

Pro

  • Berlin wall, one of the symbols of cold war, has been torn down. Pentagon stands to this day.
  • No strategic significance. Pentagon shapes are the best (according to military theory) to defend. But c'mon, when there would be a battlefield in D.C., it would be the end of the world (as we know it) anyway, so what sense does it make to have a fortress in the middle of a city?




Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Pros/cons of the actual demolition

Pro

  • The site would make a nice place for a park.
  • Building material source. The bricks or just pieces of wall could be reused for reconstruction of countries destroyed by questionable decision made there, much as the beams of Twin Towers were remelted and shaped into warships.



Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References

See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.