Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Pentagon deconstruction

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:11, 28 August 2011 (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(Pro)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 02:13, 28 August 2011 (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
Next diff →
Line 22: Line 22:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Does it makes any sense that that building still stands?===
|- |-
Line 30: Line 30:
* '''No strategic significance.''' Pentagon shapes are the best (according to military theory) to defend. But c'mon, when there would be a battlefield in D.C., it would be the end of the world (as we know it) anyway, so what sense does it make to have a fortress in the middle of a city? * '''No strategic significance.''' Pentagon shapes are the best (according to military theory) to defend. But c'mon, when there would be a battlefield in D.C., it would be the end of the world (as we know it) anyway, so what sense does it make to have a fortress in the middle of a city?
- 
-* The site would make a nice place for a park. 
- 
-* '''Building material source'''. The bricks or just pieces of wall could be reused for reconstruction of countries destroyed by questionable decision made there, much as the beams of Twin Towers were remelted and shaped into warships. 
Line 53: Line 49:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
- 
===Write Subquestion here...=== ===Write Subquestion here...===

Revision as of 02:13, 28 August 2011

This house believes that the Pentagon building should be demolished

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Does it makes any sense that that building still stands?

Pro

  • Berlin wall, one of the symbols of cold war, has been torn down. Pentagon stands to this day.
  • No strategic significance. Pentagon shapes are the best (according to military theory) to defend. But c'mon, when there would be a battlefield in D.C., it would be the end of the world (as we know it) anyway, so what sense does it make to have a fortress in the middle of a city?




Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click "edit" and write arguments here





Con

Click "edit" and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.