Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Online debate and dialogue

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:04, 2 November 2007 (edit)
Jpaulus (Talk | contribs)
(Yes)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 03:46, 4 November 2007 (edit)
Kenb (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
Next diff →
Line 69: Line 69:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Face-to face dialogue is definitely more powerful. The quest should be:how can we improve online dialogue to closer approximate the effectiveness of face-to-face dialogue.
-|-+...===
 +Ken|-
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|

Revision as of 03:46, 4 November 2007

Is online debate and dialogue a force for good?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Communication: Is online debate and dialogue better for the communication of ideas?

Yes

  • Online, written dialogue enables deep reflection and communication without time pressures. It is important that people be able to take the time to reflect and clearly express themselves. It is often hard to do this in the context of face-to-face dialogue. Time pressures can be a limitation as well as difficult group dynamics, such as a person attempting to dominate a discussion. This can create scenarios in which individuals do not find the right opportunity to jump in with a well crafted idea.
  • Online dialogue is recorded for others to read and reflect on.
  • Online debate and dialogue allows people to communicate who otherwise would not be able to in a synchronous fashion.
  • For certain types of debate, asynchronous methods provide opportunities that person to person methods do not allow. For example: TruthMapping

No

  • Face-to-face communication reduces miscommunication: It allows for emotions to be more clearly expressed through tone and gesture. The written word, particularly in dialogue, can be misinterpreted very easily. Face-to-face communications allow for mis-communications to be resolved more easily, which is very important in the context of discussing contentious and sensitive issues.


Skills: Does online debate exercise more valuable skills?

Yes

  • Online dialogue increases dialogue, which is always a good thing.
  • Online dialogue exercises the important skill of writing.


No

  • Face-to-face communication allows for the exercise of group dynamics.
  • Interpersonal dialogue helps improve public-speaking skills.


===Face-to face dialogue is definitely more powerful. The quest should be:how can we improve online dialogue to closer approximate the effectiveness of face-to-face dialogue.

...=== Ken|-

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

http://TruthMapping.com/about.php

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.