Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: HIV status should be made public

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 06:36, 24 January 2009; TheRealdeal (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Should the fact that individuals have HIV/AIDS be made public?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

  • Many people disregard the risks to others. It should be made public as in many cases we have seen hiv+ person, despite knowing that he is infected, marrys, thus transmitting the disease to the spouse as well as future progeny.


No

  • Most people who know they have HIV will let their partners or at least use contraception, and some limit themselves to other people with the disease. The fact that some HIV+ people lie about it does not justify violating the privacy rights of those that don't. Making laws against HIV+ having sex without informing their partners of their disease and enforcing them is a good enough response to the danger to the public.


Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

Write Subquestion here...

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.