Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: HIV status should be made public
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 08:09, 12 April 2009 (edit) Aussiejack (Talk | contribs) (→Public health: Would making HIV status public help reduce HIV transmission?) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 18:12, 13 April 2009 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
+ | |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| | ||
====No==== | ====No==== | ||
*'''People are unlikely to check before having sex''' When people are about to have sex, especially with someone they just met they are unlikely to think to check a database to make sure their partner doesn't have HIV. Even if the sex is part of a long-term relationship people will be unlikely to suspect they have the disease and take the time to check. | *'''People are unlikely to check before having sex''' When people are about to have sex, especially with someone they just met they are unlikely to think to check a database to make sure their partner doesn't have HIV. Even if the sex is part of a long-term relationship people will be unlikely to suspect they have the disease and take the time to check. |
Revision as of 18:12, 13 April 2009
Should the fact that individuals have HIV/AIDS be made public? |
Background and Context of Debate: |
Risks: Does risk of HIV and lies about status justify making it public? | |
Yes
|
No
|
Public health: Would making HIV status public help reduce HIV transmission? | |
Yes
|
No
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
References: | |
Related pages on Debatepedia: | |
External links and resources: |