Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Free public transportation

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 06:49, 13 March 2009 (edit)
Matthew.graham26 (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 06:53, 13 March 2009 (edit)
Matthew.graham26 (Talk | contribs)
(Write Subquestion here...)
Next diff →
Line 50: Line 50:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "Con" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+===Could the government pay for public transport services?===
|- |-
Line 56: Line 56:
====Pro==== ====Pro====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+'''The Government's job is to provide services.''' This would be a great service that could be used by everyone. Taxes already pay for health care, schools and roads etc. so why not let taxpayers see the benefits for themselves, in a useful service everyone can use.
- +
 +'''The environment would greatly benefit.''' As well as providing services, the govermnet should look out for the environment. No amount of money is too much to protect the environment.
Line 68: Line 68:
====Con==== ====Con====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+'''With the financial crisis, we can't afford to spend more money on something like this.'''

Revision as of 06:53, 13 March 2009

Should all public transport be free and paid for by the government?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Would free public transport help the environment?

Pro

Free pubilc transport would reduce the number of cars on the road. Global warming is a serious issue and if public transport was free, more people would use it, taking cars off the road. This is good because 1 train could take 2000 cars off the road.





Con

We would need more public transport. Buses, planes, trains etc. all harm the environment, just as cars do. If everyone used public transport, more buses would pollute cities.





Could the government pay for public transport services?

Pro

The Government's job is to provide services. This would be a great service that could be used by everyone. Taxes already pay for health care, schools and roads etc. so why not let taxpayers see the benefits for themselves, in a useful service everyone can use.

The environment would greatly benefit. As well as providing services, the govermnet should look out for the environment. No amount of money is too much to protect the environment.




Con

With the financial crisis, we can't afford to spend more money on something like this.





Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





References:

Related pages on Debatepedia:

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.