Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Fair trade
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
Revision as of 16:11, 20 December 2010 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→No) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 16:13, 20 December 2010 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) (→No) Next diff → |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*'''Fair Trade acts as subsidy, distorting markets.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Who could object to [Fair Trade]. Economists, for a start. The standard economic argument against Fairtrade goes like this: the low price of commodities such as coffee is due to overproduction, and ought to be a signal to producers to switch to growing other crops. Paying a guaranteed Fairtrade premium—in effect, a subsidy—both prevents this signal from getting through and, by raising the average price paid for coffee, encourages more producers to enter the market. This then drives down the price of non-Fairtrade coffee even further, making non-Fairtrade farmers poorer. Fairtrade does not address the basic problem, argues Tim Harford, author of “The Undercover Economist” (2005), which is that too much coffee is being produced in the first place. Instead, it could even encourage more production." | *'''Fair Trade acts as subsidy, distorting markets.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Who could object to [Fair Trade]. Economists, for a start. The standard economic argument against Fairtrade goes like this: the low price of commodities such as coffee is due to overproduction, and ought to be a signal to producers to switch to growing other crops. Paying a guaranteed Fairtrade premium—in effect, a subsidy—both prevents this signal from getting through and, by raising the average price paid for coffee, encourages more producers to enter the market. This then drives down the price of non-Fairtrade coffee even further, making non-Fairtrade farmers poorer. Fairtrade does not address the basic problem, argues Tim Harford, author of “The Undercover Economist” (2005), which is that too much coffee is being produced in the first place. Instead, it could even encourage more production." | ||
- | *'''Fair Trade certification often wrongly offered to small farmers.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Another objection to Fairtrade is that certification is predicated on political assumptions about the best way to organise labour. In particular, for some commodities (including coffee) certification is available only to co-operatives of small producers, who are deemed to be most likely to give workers a fair deal when deciding how to spend the Fairtrade premium. Coffee plantations or large family firms cannot be certified. Mr Bretman says the rules vary from commodity to commodity, but are intended to ensure that the Fairtrade system helps those most in need. Yet limiting certification to co-ops means 'missing out on helping the vast majority of farm workers, who work on plantations,' says Mr Wille of the Rainforest Alliance, which certifies producers of all kinds." | + | *'''Fair Trade certificates often offered on political considerations.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Another objection to Fairtrade is that certification is predicated on political assumptions about the best way to organise labour. In particular, for some commodities (including coffee) certification is available only to co-operatives of small producers, who are deemed to be most likely to give workers a fair deal when deciding how to spend the Fairtrade premium. Coffee plantations or large family firms cannot be certified. Mr Bretman says the rules vary from commodity to commodity, but are intended to ensure that the Fairtrade system helps those most in need. Yet limiting certification to co-ops means 'missing out on helping the vast majority of farm workers, who work on plantations,' says Mr Wille of the Rainforest Alliance, which certifies producers of all kinds." |
Revision as of 16:13, 20 December 2010
Is "fair trade" good for the world? What are the pros and cons? |
Background and context |
Write Subquestion here... | |
Yes
|
NoSome fair trade farms have been found to have worse conditions than other ones. This is because although they get paid more per pound of the item, they sell less at some farms.
|
Write Subquestion here... | |
YesClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
NoClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here |
Pro/con sources | |
Yes
|
No
|
See alsoExternal links and resources |