Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Fair trade

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:49, 17 May 2008 (edit)
Verycoolguy (Talk | contribs)
(Yes)
← Previous diff
Current revision (22:23, 15 October 2011) (edit)
Myclob (Talk | contribs)
(External links and resources)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""|
===Is "fair trade" good for the world? What are the pros and cons?=== ===Is "fair trade" good for the world? What are the pros and cons?===
-|} 
- 
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center" 
-|__TOC__ 
|} |}
Line 12: Line 8:
|- |-
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+===Background and context ===
|} |}
 +
{| {|
|- |-
Line 27: Line 24:
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-''[[Perfectly competitive]] industries do not have any price control, and all the farms bring other farms prices down, and in the long run, everybody loses, and the standard of living will decrease. Fair trade acts as a price floor, making sure the prices do not get too low. ''+*'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfectly_competitive Perfect competition on Wikipedia]: Price floor.''' Perfectly competitive industries do not have any price control, and all the farms bring other farms prices down, and in the long run, everybody loses, and the standard of living will decrease. Fair trade acts as a price floor, making sure the prices do not get too low.
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====No==== ====No====
-''Some fair trade farms have been found to have worse conditions than other ones. This is because although they get paid more per pound of the item, they sell less at some farms.''+Some fair trade farms have been found to have worse conditions than other ones. This is because although they get paid more per pound of the item, they sell less at some farms.
 + 
 +*'''Fair Trade acts as subsidy, distorting markets.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Who could object to [Fair Trade]. Economists, for a start. The standard economic argument against Fairtrade goes like this: the low price of commodities such as coffee is due to overproduction, and ought to be a signal to producers to switch to growing other crops. Paying a guaranteed Fairtrade premium—in effect, a subsidy—both prevents this signal from getting through and, by raising the average price paid for coffee, encourages more producers to enter the market. This then drives down the price of non-Fairtrade coffee even further, making non-Fairtrade farmers poorer. Fairtrade does not address the basic problem, argues Tim Harford, author of “The Undercover Economist” (2005), which is that too much coffee is being produced in the first place. Instead, it could even encourage more production."
 + 
 +*'''Fair Trade certificates often offered on political considerations.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Another objection to Fairtrade is that certification is predicated on political assumptions about the best way to organise labour. In particular, for some commodities (including coffee) certification is available only to co-operatives of small producers, who are deemed to be most likely to give workers a fair deal when deciding how to spend the Fairtrade premium. Coffee plantations or large family firms cannot be certified. Mr Bretman says the rules vary from commodity to commodity, but are intended to ensure that the Fairtrade system helps those most in need. Yet limiting certification to co-ops means 'missing out on helping the vast majority of farm workers, who work on plantations,' says Mr Wille of the Rainforest Alliance, which certifies producers of all kinds."
 + 
 +*'''Guaranteeing a price can diminish quality.''' [http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]: "Guaranteeing a minimum price also means there is no incentive to improve quality, grumble coffee-drinkers, who find that the quality of Fairtrade brews varies widely."
 + 
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
Line 47: Line 51:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===Write Subquestion here...===+=== Pro/con sources ===
|- |-
Line 53: Line 57:
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+*[http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/ Fair Trade Foundation]
 + 
 + 
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
- 
====No==== ====No====
-''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''+ 
 +*Singleton, A: "The poverty of fair trade.", Adam Smith Institute, 2005
 +*[http://www.economist.com/node/8380592?story_id=8380592 "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006]
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+*[[Debate: Countries should ban the import of goods produced by child labor]]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+==External links and resources==
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade Fair Trade on Wikipedia]
-|-+
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
- +
-===External links and resources:===+
- +
- +
|} |}
Line 77: Line 78:
[[Category:Agriculture]] [[Category:Agriculture]]
[[Category:Third world]] [[Category:Third world]]
-[[Category:Developing world]]+[[Category:Developing countries]]
 +[[Category:Economic development]]
 +[[Category:Workers rights]]
 +[[Category:Human rights]]
 +[[Category:Equality]]
 +[[Category:Free trade]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Is "fair trade" good for the world? What are the pros and cons?

Background and context

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

  • Perfect competition on Wikipedia: Price floor. Perfectly competitive industries do not have any price control, and all the farms bring other farms prices down, and in the long run, everybody loses, and the standard of living will decrease. Fair trade acts as a price floor, making sure the prices do not get too low.
[Add New]

No

Some fair trade farms have been found to have worse conditions than other ones. This is because although they get paid more per pound of the item, they sell less at some farms.

  • Fair Trade acts as subsidy, distorting markets. "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006: "Who could object to [Fair Trade]. Economists, for a start. The standard economic argument against Fairtrade goes like this: the low price of commodities such as coffee is due to overproduction, and ought to be a signal to producers to switch to growing other crops. Paying a guaranteed Fairtrade premium—in effect, a subsidy—both prevents this signal from getting through and, by raising the average price paid for coffee, encourages more producers to enter the market. This then drives down the price of non-Fairtrade coffee even further, making non-Fairtrade farmers poorer. Fairtrade does not address the basic problem, argues Tim Harford, author of “The Undercover Economist” (2005), which is that too much coffee is being produced in the first place. Instead, it could even encourage more production."
  • Fair Trade certificates often offered on political considerations. "Voting with your trolley." The Economist. December 7th, 2006: "Another objection to Fairtrade is that certification is predicated on political assumptions about the best way to organise labour. In particular, for some commodities (including coffee) certification is available only to co-operatives of small producers, who are deemed to be most likely to give workers a fair deal when deciding how to spend the Fairtrade premium. Coffee plantations or large family firms cannot be certified. Mr Bretman says the rules vary from commodity to commodity, but are intended to ensure that the Fairtrade system helps those most in need. Yet limiting certification to co-ops means 'missing out on helping the vast majority of farm workers, who work on plantations,' says Mr Wille of the Rainforest Alliance, which certifies producers of all kinds."
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con sources

[Add New]

Yes


[Add New]

No

See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.