Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Debate: Chicken or the egg
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 16:16, 24 February 2009 (edit) Caulfield (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 16:17, 24 February 2009 (edit) Caulfield (Talk | contribs) (→Yes) Next diff → |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| I think people need to have a lot more respect for other peoples arguements, otherwise there is no point in having a discussion. Furthermore, people must stop over stating what science has proven and understand that the Theory of Evolution is still open to logical criticism and is not sometime to be considered fact at least by someone who has not criticised their own understanding of it. | I think people need to have a lot more respect for other peoples arguements, otherwise there is no point in having a discussion. Furthermore, people must stop over stating what science has proven and understand that the Theory of Evolution is still open to logical criticism and is not sometime to be considered fact at least by someone who has not criticised their own understanding of it. | ||
| - | My view is that the chicken came first because God created it. i am not mad nor do a state my opoinion lightly. Some may not agree but that does not mean thay are right. If a Chicken cannot spring up out of nowhere then neither can a chicken egg. | + | My view is that the chicken came first because God created it. i am not mad nor do a state my opoinion lightly. Some may not agree but that does not mean thay are right. If a Chicken cannot spring up out of nowhere then neither can a chicken egg. |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | Well the age old question strikes again. In my belief, the egg had to have come first. If anyone wants to make a rebuttle, go right ahead. What I want to ask you is how did the chicken get there in the first place without the egg? The egg has been used as a symbol of life for as long as I can remember. Without the egg, there can be no life of the chicken. If you say no, how can you say that some random chicken just came out of nowhere and that's how we get the chicken we see today.Impossible. I think that there just may have been a species similar to the chicken. Scientist say that even some dinosaurs may have been related to the chicken. Possibly, one of them kept mutating and that is how we got the chicken today, but even dinosaurs layed eggs. I would love to hear some of you that say no though.(This question should be under yes by the way.) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | |width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| | + | |
| ====No==== | ====No==== | ||
| ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' | ||
Revision as of 16:17, 24 February 2009
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? |
|
