Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Barack Obama awarded Nobel Peace Prize

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 09:07, 28 October 2009; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Nobel Peace Prize is in the right hands of Barack Obama

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

Politics: It is politically justifiable?

Pro

  • Obama's re-engagement on issues of global peace justify Peace Prize. Anthony Cantor. "Obama deserved peace prize." Argus Leader. October 28, 2009: "Just as the Bush administration was a threat to world peace, President Obama's re-engagement with the Middle East peace process, calls for nuclear disarmament and commitment to end illegal torture and close extra-legal prison camps are all measures that advance the cause of peace."



Con

  • Barack Obama has not accomplished enough to warrant peace prize. Robert Reich. "Why Obama Should Not Have Received the Peace Prize -- Yet." Huffington Post. October 12, 2009: "I'd rather Obama had won it after Congress agreed to substantial cuts in greenhouse gases comparable to what Europe is proposing, after he brought Palestinians and Israelis together to accept a two-state solution, after he got the United States out of Afghanistan and reduced the nuclear arm's threat between Pakistan and India, or after he was well on the way to eliminating the world's stockpile of nuclear weapons. Any one of these would have been worthy of global praise. Perhaps the Nobel committee can give him half the prize now and withhold the other half until he accomplishes one or more of these crucial missions."
  • Obama only campaigned in 2008, year for which he received Peace Prize. According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded to the person who: "During the preceding year [...] shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." And, yet, during this year, Barack Obama was only campaigning, was not the President of the United States, and had not yet implemented any concrete steps toward peace.

Future efforts: Will the Peace Prize be helpful in Obama's future efforts?

Pro

  • It can help B. Obama in future negotiations. Given the great importance and fame of the Nobel Peace Prize, failed or failing (or "problematic") states (state leaders) can see this act of giving the NPP to Barack Obama as a warranty that the American president is willing to negotiate instead of ignoring/attacking the rough states. It can place in Obama's hands even greater power and thus help him in his future missions.


Con

Vs other candidates: Was Obama the most deserving candidate among the alternatives?

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con

  • There are more deserving candidates than Barack Obama for Peace Prize. Cal Thomas. "Obama Should Have Won Toastmaster Award Not Nobel Prize." FOXNews.com. October 09, 2009: "Real peace is achieved when enemies of freedom are defeated. Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II have more legitimate claims to the prize than President Obama. Even Bill Clinton, who reaped the benefits of years of work to bring peace to Northern Ireland, as well as his commitment of troops to Bosnia to end sectarian strife, has a better claim to the prize than Obama."


War President? Does it matter that Obama may increase the war effort in Afghanistan?

Pro

Con

  • Peace Prize wrongly given to Obama to influence war policy. Michael Tomasky. "Should Obama have accepted the Nobel prize?" Guardian: "will being a Nobel peace prize winner limit his range of options as America's commander-in-chief in any way? Can a peace prize winner really then go forward and put 20,000 more US soldiers in Afghanistan? Did those sneaky Scandinavian pacifists have this thought up their Scandinavian sleeves?"

Write Subquestion here...

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





Con


See also

External links and resources:

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.