Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: B.C. and A.D.

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:57, 22 September 2009 (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(design edits)
← Previous diff
Current revision (17:02, 16 June 2011) (edit)
England4ever (Talk | contribs)
(Background and context)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
===Background and context === ===Background and context ===
-Before Christ abbreviated as BC or B.C., also known as Ante Christum Natum, is used to denote years reckoned backwards from the birth date of Jesus Christ and used in the Gregorian Calendar. The use of BC is believed to originate with the Bede in the 8th century but only became popular in the modern era.+Before Christ abbreviated as BC or B.C., also known as Ante Christum Natum, is used to denote years reckoned backwards from the birth date of Jesus Christ and used in the Gregorian Calendar. The use of BC is believed to originate with the Bede in the 8th century but only became popular in the modern era. Although 0 is usually thought of as the year of Christ's birth, it was actually the year in which he turned 3, because he was crucified in 30 AD at the age of 33.
This debate discusses the use of Before Christ. This debate discusses the use of Before Christ.
<small>Part of this introduction uses text from the Wikipedia article on before christ</small> <small>Part of this introduction uses text from the Wikipedia article on before christ</small>
-|} 
- 
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center" 
-|__TOC__ 
|} |}
Line 48: Line 44:
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====No==== ====No====
-*'''The year "0" is based on the believed year that Jesus was born, and using B.C.E. just ignores that.''' Everyone can accept that the calendar is based off of Jesus, even if they don't agree that it should be. It should not be considered offensive to know this.+*'''The year "0" is based on the believed year that Jesus was turned 3, and using B.C.E. just ignores that.''' Everyone can accept that the calendar is based off of Jesus, even if they don't agree that it should be. It should not be considered offensive to know this.
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Are the terms B.C. and A.D. appropriate or are B.C.E and C.E. better?

Background and context

Before Christ abbreviated as BC or B.C., also known as Ante Christum Natum, is used to denote years reckoned backwards from the birth date of Jesus Christ and used in the Gregorian Calendar. The use of BC is believed to originate with the Bede in the 8th century but only became popular in the modern era. Although 0 is usually thought of as the year of Christ's birth, it was actually the year in which he turned 3, because he was crucified in 30 AD at the age of 33.

This debate discusses the use of Before Christ.

Part of this introduction uses text from the Wikipedia article on before christ

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Are people disrespecting non Christian Religions when they use BC?

[Add New]

Yes

  • The existence of Christ is not accepted by many religions. By using the existence of christ in the date system you are going aainst there religion.
[Add New]

No

  • It is just a phrase. It does not say that any religion is right or wrong, it is just comparing a time to the possible date of Christ's existence.
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Should BCE (Before the common era) be used instead?

[Add New]

Yes

  • It does not promote certain religious beliefs. The existence of Christ is not accepted by many religions. By using the existence of Christ in the date system, you are implying that Christian religions are more accurate than others.
[Add New]

No

  • The year "0" is based on the believed year that Jesus was turned 3, and using B.C.E. just ignores that. Everyone can accept that the calendar is based off of Jesus, even if they don't agree that it should be. It should not be considered offensive to know this.
[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con resources

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No

See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.