Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Abortion for physical deformities

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 03:25, 17 July 2008 (edit)
Kye Hanafiah (Talk | contribs)
(No)
← Previous diff
Current revision (17:42, 12 September 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(See also)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""| |colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style=""|
===Should we allow abortion on the grounds of physical deformity?=== ===Should we allow abortion on the grounds of physical deformity?===
-|} 
- 
-{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center" 
-|__TOC__ 
|} |}
Line 12: Line 8:
|- |-
|bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"| |bgcolor="#F7F7F7" colspan="2" style= "border:1px solid #BAC5FD"|
-===Background and Context of Debate:===+===Background and context===
Although the ruling on abortion differs between judicial systems of different countries, even the most conservative countries such as Saudi Arabia now adopt the policy of permitting abortion when it endangers the life or physical wellbeing of the woman bearing the child to term. Most countries however, still don't allow abortion on grounds of the foetus's wellbeing, i.e. in the case of early detection of Down Syndrome or other physical deformities via amniocentesis, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Although the ruling on abortion differs between judicial systems of different countries, even the most conservative countries such as Saudi Arabia now adopt the policy of permitting abortion when it endangers the life or physical wellbeing of the woman bearing the child to term. Most countries however, still don't allow abortion on grounds of the foetus's wellbeing, i.e. in the case of early detection of Down Syndrome or other physical deformities via amniocentesis, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS).
Line 23: Line 19:
|} |}
 +
 +{| style="width:100%; height:100px" border="0" align="center"
 +|__TOC__
 +|}
 +
{| {|
|- |-
Line 34: Line 35:
|WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"| |WRITE SUBQUESTION BETWEEN "=== ===" width="45%" bgcolor="#FFFAE0" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top:0.5em;"|
====Yes==== ====Yes====
-*Some physical deformities make it impossible for the individual to compete and survive in today's harsh world+*Some physical deformities make it impossible for the individual to compete and survive in today's harsh world.
-*In many places, particularly poorer areas, deformed kids are abandoned and left to be taken care of orphanages that are not suitable/ conducive for growth+*In many places, particularly poorer areas, deformed kids are abandoned and left to be taken care of orphanages that are not suitable/ conducive for growth.
-*The responsibility of parents to take care of child born gives them a say in making sure the child they have is one they '''can''' take care of+*The responsibility of parents to take care of child born gives them a say in making sure the child they have is one they '''can''' take care of. If they think that they not be able to care for the child with deformities then they should be allowed to have an abortion.
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "YES" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE width="45%" bgcolor="#F2FAFB" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em;"|
====No==== ====No====
-*Different utilitarian/ cosmetic reasons can't justify abortion +*Different utilitarian/ cosmetic reasons can't justify abortion.
-*Nazi-like perspective to put value on life based on appearance or characteristics (massacred people based on race, crippled, deformities) i.e. choice has no place/ power in the case of life +*Nazi-like perspective to put value on life based on appearance or characteristics (massacred people based on race, crippled, deformities) i.e. choice has no place/ power in the case of life.
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
Line 66: Line 56:
*Cements some societal prejudices toward the disabled, that 'they should never have been born' *Cements some societal prejudices toward the disabled, that 'they should never have been born'
*Insensitive to the many disabled/ handicapped who have been contributing individuals and have risen above and beyond their disabilities *Insensitive to the many disabled/ handicapped who have been contributing individuals and have risen above and beyond their disabilities
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Line 77: Line 62:
====No==== ====No====
*While some disabled/ handicapped have been able to contribute, many who were raised by parents who were not prepared to are reduced to begging in adulthood as they are unable to find jobs later on. This burdens the government and society *While some disabled/ handicapped have been able to contribute, many who were raised by parents who were not prepared to are reduced to begging in adulthood as they are unable to find jobs later on. This burdens the government and society
-*It's not an outright elimination of handicapped people, because now with adequate knowledge, parents who do bring deformed children to term are the ones ready and able to take care of these kids; something that is necessary for the kids to stand a chance at becoming contributing individuals+*It's not an outright elimination of handicapped people, because now with adequate knowledge, parents who do bring deformed children to term are the ones ready and able to take care of these kids; something that is necessary for the kids to stand a chance at becoming contributing individual
- +
- +
- +
- +
- +
Line 95: Line 75:
====Yes==== ====Yes====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
- 
- 
- 
Line 107: Line 84:
====No==== ====No====
''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here'' ''Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here''
- 
- 
- 
- 
Line 117: Line 90:
|- |-
|WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"| |WRITE CONTENT FOR THE "NO" BOX ABOVE THIS CODE colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;padding:.4em;padding-top: 0.5em ;"|
-===References:=== +==See also==
-|-+*[[Debate: Abortion]]
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"|+*[[Debate: Parental consent for underage abortions]]
-===Related pages on Debatepedia:===+==External links and resources==
-|-+ 
-|colspan="2" width="45%" bgcolor="#F2F2F2" style="border:1px solid #BAC5FD;"| +
-===External links and resources:=== 
Line 131: Line 102:
[[Category:Asian Parliamentary Debate]] [[Category:Asian Parliamentary Debate]]
[[Category:Abortion]] [[Category:Abortion]]
 +[[Category:Life and death]]
 +[[Category:Morality]]
 +[[Category:Religion]]
 +[[Category:Family]]
 +[[Category:Underdeveloped debates]]

Current revision

[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should we allow abortion on the grounds of physical deformity?

Background and context

Although the ruling on abortion differs between judicial systems of different countries, even the most conservative countries such as Saudi Arabia now adopt the policy of permitting abortion when it endangers the life or physical wellbeing of the woman bearing the child to term. Most countries however, still don't allow abortion on grounds of the foetus's wellbeing, i.e. in the case of early detection of Down Syndrome or other physical deformities via amniocentesis, and chorionic villus sampling (CVS).

One of the few countries allowing for such abortions, Netherlands, is heavily criticized for condoning an abortion that is seen as an act of discrimination against the handicapped and disabled. Comparison of such ruling has been made with the Hitler regime's call to provide 'mercy of death' to those who are seen as 'incurable after thorough diagnosis of their ill condition'. A form of 'life unworthy of life' was characterized for those born with debilitating conditions has been opposed by many parties, particularly those against infanticide in general. They argue that an abortion done only after a prenatal diagnosis of incurable illness is not a matter of a person exercising their right to live they want to, because the act implies that they are ready for a child- only not THAT child, a form of discrimination.

People arguing for the choice to abort fetuses with detectable deformities cite a form of informed consent, when they are allowed to decide whether or not they want to bring to term a child that they would have to spend more energy and resources on due to his or her conditions.

In evaluating this issue, questions like: does parental choice supersede sanctity of life? is it discrimination and undermines the life of the handicapped? are among the main contentions of the debate.

Contents

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Does the parental right to choose supersede the fetus's right to live?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Some physical deformities make it impossible for the individual to compete and survive in today's harsh world.
  • In many places, particularly poorer areas, deformed kids are abandoned and left to be taken care of orphanages that are not suitable/ conducive for growth.
  • The responsibility of parents to take care of child born gives them a say in making sure the child they have is one they can take care of. If they think that they not be able to care for the child with deformities then they should be allowed to have an abortion.
[Add New]

No

  • Different utilitarian/ cosmetic reasons can't justify abortion.
  • Nazi-like perspective to put value on life based on appearance or characteristics (massacred people based on race, crippled, deformities) i.e. choice has no place/ power in the case of life.


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Does it undermine the lives of the disabled community?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Allowing abortion on these grounds is tantamount to wishing dead on anyone not fitting societies' description of normal
  • Cements some societal prejudices toward the disabled, that 'they should never have been born'
  • Insensitive to the many disabled/ handicapped who have been contributing individuals and have risen above and beyond their disabilities


[Add New]

No

  • While some disabled/ handicapped have been able to contribute, many who were raised by parents who were not prepared to are reduced to begging in adulthood as they are unable to find jobs later on. This burdens the government and society
  • It's not an outright elimination of handicapped people, because now with adequate knowledge, parents who do bring deformed children to term are the ones ready and able to take care of these kids; something that is necessary for the kids to stand a chance at becoming contributing individual


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here



[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here



See also

External links and resources

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.