Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: US rejections of UN calls to close Guantanamo look very bad

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:27, 29 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 01:30, 29 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting evidence)
Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*“In the case of the Guantanamo Bay detainees, the U.S. executive operates as judge, as prosecutor, and as defense council: this constitutes serious violations of various guarantees of the right to a fair trial before an independent tribunal.” *“In the case of the Guantanamo Bay detainees, the U.S. executive operates as judge, as prosecutor, and as defense council: this constitutes serious violations of various guarantees of the right to a fair trial before an independent tribunal.”
 +*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_02_06_un_guantanamo.pdf "Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Civil and Political Rights. Situation of detainees at Guantánamo Bay". United Nations Economic and Social Council. February 15, 2006]

Revision as of 01:30, 29 January 2008

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.