Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: US rejections of UN calls to close Guantanamo look very bad

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:30, 29 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting evidence)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:46, 14 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Guantanamo Bay]]+*[[Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*“In the case of the Guantanamo Bay detainees, the U.S. executive operates as judge, as prosecutor, and as defense council: this constitutes serious violations of various guarantees of the right to a fair trial before an independent tribunal.” *“In the case of the Guantanamo Bay detainees, the U.S. executive operates as judge, as prosecutor, and as defense council: this constitutes serious violations of various guarantees of the right to a fair trial before an independent tribunal.”
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_02_06_un_guantanamo.pdf "Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Civil and Political Rights. Situation of detainees at Guantánamo Bay". United Nations Economic and Social Council. February 15, 2006] *[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_02_06_un_guantanamo.pdf "Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Civil and Political Rights. Situation of detainees at Guantánamo Bay". United Nations Economic and Social Council. February 15, 2006]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.