Personal tools

Argument: The threat or use of nuclear weapons is legal in desperate defense

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 07:49, 13 February 2008; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • In 1996, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled, "in view of the current state of international law, and of the elements of fact at its disposal, the Court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival of a state would be at stake."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits