Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: The Three Gorges Dam has submerged mines, resulting in pollution

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 23:27, 14 February 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (18:12, 9 June 2010) (edit)
Renergy (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Three Gorges Dam]]+*[[Debate: Three Gorges Dam]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*[http://www.flathatnews.com/news/1304/three-gorges-dam-a-blessing-or-an-environmental-disaster Ethan Theuerkauf. "Three Gorges Dam: A Blessing or an Environmental Disaster?". Flat Hat. October 2nd, 2007] - "According to the International Rivers Network, hundreds of factories, mines and waste dumps were submerged during the construction of the dam, which is leading to major pollution problems in the Yangtze River and its tributaries." *[http://www.flathatnews.com/news/1304/three-gorges-dam-a-blessing-or-an-environmental-disaster Ethan Theuerkauf. "Three Gorges Dam: A Blessing or an Environmental Disaster?". Flat Hat. October 2nd, 2007] - "According to the International Rivers Network, hundreds of factories, mines and waste dumps were submerged during the construction of the dam, which is leading to major pollution problems in the Yangtze River and its tributaries."

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.