Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: The Kyoto Protocol is showing little progress in reducing emissions

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 20:37, 4 December 2007 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 20:38, 4 December 2007 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting evidence)
Next diff →
Line 4: Line 4:
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7165/full/449973a.html Gwyn Prins and Steve Rayner, British economists. "Time to ditch Kyoto". Nature. October, 22nd, 2007] - "It (Kyoto) has produced no demonstrable reductions in emissions." *[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7165/full/449973a.html Gwyn Prins and Steve Rayner, British economists. "Time to ditch Kyoto". Nature. October, 22nd, 2007] - "It (Kyoto) has produced no demonstrable reductions in emissions."
 +
 +==Counter-argument==
 +
 +==See also==
 +
 +==External links==

Revision as of 20:38, 4 December 2007

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

Counter-argument

See also

External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.