Personal tools

Argument: Teaching creationism vs. evolution controversy is for promotion intelligent design

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District[1] - "ID’s backers have sought to avoid the scientific scrutiny which we have now determined that it cannot withstand by advocating that the controversy, but not ID itself, should be taught in science class. This tactic is at best disingenuous, and at worst a canard. The goal of the IDM is not to encourage critical thought, but to foment a revolution which would supplant evolutionary theory with ID."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits