Personal tools

Argument: Polls show massive public support for banning animal testing for specific household products

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 18:59, 9 May 2008; Militaru andreea (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent Debate

Supporting Evidence

:A new opinion poll reveals that UK consumers (particularly women) want to
take the cruelty out of cleaning. The opinion poll(i) was commissioned by
animal protection group the BUAV to mark National Cruelty-Free Week (5-11
July)(ii) and conducted by Opinion Research Business (ORB). It reveals
that a massive 78% of the British public (82% of women) support a UK ban
on animal testing for household cleaning products like washing up liquid
or carpet shampoo. 

:National Cruelty-Free Week aims to raise public awareness that animal
testing for beauty and household cleaning products still goes on, and
encourages shoppers to ditch their animal tested products and go
cruelty-free instead.

:The new poll also reveals that UK shoppers are eager to ditch traditional
cleaning brands in favour of 'cruelty-free' alternatives, and are keen for
more supermarkets to produce own-brand cleaning products approved as 'not
tested on animals' by animal campaigners the British Union for the
Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV). 80% of those asked would be more likely
to swap to a brand approved by the animal group.

  • 79% of UK shoppers (83% of women) say they would be likely to swap
to a brand that was not animal tested if they discovered their existing
brand was tested on animals 
*	86% of the British public would support their local grocery store

introducing a range of household products not tested on animals

*	80% of those questioned (85% of women) said that if they wanted a
household product that was not tested on animals, they would be more
likely to buy it if it was approved by the BUAV as cruelty-free.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits