Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Nuclear power plants are vulnerable to terrorist attack

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 04:03, 25 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (07:50, 15 July 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Nuclear energy]]+*[[Debate: Nuclear energy]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*[http://timeforchange.org/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power-and-sustainability Time for Change] - "Nuclear power plants as well as nuclear waste could be preferred targets for terrorist attacks. No atomic energy plant in the world could withstand an attack similar to 9/11 in Yew York. Such a terrorist act would have catastrophic effects for the whole world." *[http://timeforchange.org/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power-and-sustainability Time for Change] - "Nuclear power plants as well as nuclear waste could be preferred targets for terrorist attacks. No atomic energy plant in the world could withstand an attack similar to 9/11 in Yew York. Such a terrorist act would have catastrophic effects for the whole world."

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Time for Change - "Nuclear power plants as well as nuclear waste could be preferred targets for terrorist attacks. No atomic energy plant in the world could withstand an attack similar to 9/11 in Yew York. Such a terrorist act would have catastrophic effects for the whole world."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.