Argument: Marijuana is natural; dispensaries should be allowed

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: Marijuana is natural; dispensaries should be allowed From Debatepedia Revision as of 22:12, 15 October 2010; Brooks Lindsay (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Medical marijuana dispensaries [Edit] Supporting quotations Cedaredge Town Council Trustee Nancy Sturgill said in 2009: "This [marijuana] is a very natural product, said Sturgill, and I don’t feel conﬁdent in denying Cedaredge residents access at this point.”[1] Retrieved from "http://www.dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Marijuana_is_natural%3B_dispensaries_should_be_allowed"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate