Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Kangaroos can be culled humanely through sedation then euthanasia

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 04:52, 9 April 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting evidence)
← Previous diff
Current revision (16:49, 20 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Kangaroo Culling]]+*[[Debate: Kangaroo culling in Australia]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*The chief minister of the Australian Capital Territory, John Stanhope, said a scientific panel advising the government had concluded that "the most humane approach would be sedation by darting, then euthanasia by lethal injection."[http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/13/asia/australia.php] *The chief minister of the Australian Capital Territory, John Stanhope, said a scientific panel advising the government had concluded that "the most humane approach would be sedation by darting, then euthanasia by lethal injection."[http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/13/asia/australia.php]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • The chief minister of the Australian Capital Territory, John Stanhope, said a scientific panel advising the government had concluded that "the most humane approach would be sedation by darting, then euthanasia by lethal injection."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.