Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Journalism is not independent under control of media moguls

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:28, 1 May 2009 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (09:04, 1 July 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate: Should governments subsidize journalism?]]+*[[Debate: Should governments bailout journalism?]]
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
Hugo Black wrote: "Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society." According to a May 18, 2009 article in The Nation, "Black argued for the right and necessity of the government to counteract private monopolistic control over the media."[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090406/nichols_mcchesney/3] Hugo Black wrote: "Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society." According to a May 18, 2009 article in The Nation, "Black argued for the right and necessity of the government to counteract private monopolistic control over the media."[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090406/nichols_mcchesney/3]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Hugo Black wrote: "Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society." According to a May 18, 2009 article in The Nation, "Black argued for the right and necessity of the government to counteract private monopolistic control over the media."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.