Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Incomes and rewards in capitalism are unequal

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:08, 29 January 2010 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (08:47, 5 April 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
*[[Debate: Capitalism vs socialism]] *[[Debate: Capitalism vs socialism]]
- +*[[Debate: Socialism]]
==Extended argument== ==Extended argument==
The only sensible conclusion is that the poorest people are being exploited by the richest people, who are making huge profits off their exploitation. You can get similar results from other figures as well. The World Bank estimated in 2005 that more than half the world's population lived on less than $2 a day. Meanwhile the latest Forbes magazine “rich list” said there were 793 billionaires worldwide with a combined wealth of more than US$4 trillion. Is that fair? The only sensible conclusion is that the poorest people are being exploited by the richest people, who are making huge profits off their exploitation. You can get similar results from other figures as well. The World Bank estimated in 2005 that more than half the world's population lived on less than $2 a day. Meanwhile the latest Forbes magazine “rich list” said there were 793 billionaires worldwide with a combined wealth of more than US$4 trillion. Is that fair?

Current revision

Parent debate

Extended argument

The only sensible conclusion is that the poorest people are being exploited by the richest people, who are making huge profits off their exploitation. You can get similar results from other figures as well. The World Bank estimated in 2005 that more than half the world's population lived on less than $2 a day. Meanwhile the latest Forbes magazine “rich list” said there were 793 billionaires worldwide with a combined wealth of more than US$4 trillion. Is that fair?

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.