Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Guantanamo bay violates the Geneva convention

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 23:36, 28 January 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (15:44, 14 June 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Guantanamo Bay]]+*[[Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center]]
- +
==Supporting evidence== ==Supporting evidence==
*[http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3024/ Karen J. Greenberg. "8 Reasons to Close Guantnamo Now". In These Times. February 12, 2007] - "#2 It violates the Geneva Conventions Guantánamo is a prisoner-of-war camp that is not labeled as such. From the beginning, the administration took the legal position that the captives brought to Cuba were not prisoners of war, but fell into the vague, newly created legal category of “enemy combatants.” *[http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3024/ Karen J. Greenberg. "8 Reasons to Close Guantnamo Now". In These Times. February 12, 2007] - "#2 It violates the Geneva Conventions Guantánamo is a prisoner-of-war camp that is not labeled as such. From the beginning, the administration took the legal position that the captives brought to Cuba were not prisoners of war, but fell into the vague, newly created legal category of “enemy combatants.”

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

But according to the International Committee of the Red Cross Commentary to the conventions, no such intermediate ground between civilians and prisoners of war exists: “Every person in enemy hands must have some status under international law: he is either a prisoner of war and, as such, covered by the Third Convention, a civilian covered by the Fourth Convention, [or] a member of the medical personnel of the armed forces who is covered by the First Convention. There is no intermediate status; nobody in enemy hands can fall outside the law.”
As the camp was being built, military personnel I interviewed said they knew not to use the words “prison-camp,” or “prison.” Why? Under the Geneva Conventions, a prisoner cannot be interrogated, punished, or forced to answer questions beyond rank, name and serial number."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.