Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Euthanasia contradicts the physicians fundamental role as healer

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:37, 28 April 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Current revision (09:12, 16 July 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Euthanasia]]+*[[Debate: Assisted suicide]]
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
'''American Medical Association. Policy E-2.21 Euthanasia, www.ama-assn.org. 1996''' - "permitting physicians to engage in euthanasia would ultimately cause more harm than good. Euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks."[http://www.euthanasiaprocon.org/top10.html] '''American Medical Association. Policy E-2.21 Euthanasia, www.ama-assn.org. 1996''' - "permitting physicians to engage in euthanasia would ultimately cause more harm than good. Euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks."[http://www.euthanasiaprocon.org/top10.html]

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

American Medical Association. Policy E-2.21 Euthanasia, www.ama-assn.org. 1996 - "permitting physicians to engage in euthanasia would ultimately cause more harm than good. Euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.