Personal tools

Argument: Efficacy cannot justify inhumane/illegal enhanced interrogations

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 18:49, 28 April 2009; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

The United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment defines torture as: "No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture [or, enhanced interrogations, which inflict pain and suffering and many consider to qualify as torture]."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits