Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Effective cap-and-trade system helps reduce costs of emissions

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:16, 13 July 2007 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(The United States sulfur dioxide cap-and-trade system, and damage control:)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 11:31, 2 October 2007 (edit)
Administrator (Talk | contribs)
(1 revision(s))
Next diff →

Revision as of 11:31, 2 October 2007

Evidence: the United States sulfur dioxide cap-and-trade system and its damage control:

The United States sulfure dioxide cap-and-trade system proved very economically beneficial (cost savings). According to the EPA, the benefits of the 1990 amendments exceeded implementation costs by a factor of four, with a maximum estimate of $1.4 trillion.[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.