Personal tools

Argument: Differences between humans and animals can be accounted for in tests

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 00:57, 9 May 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
← Previous diff
Current revision (15:52, 29 May 2010) (edit)
Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(Parent debate)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
-*[[Debate:Animal Experimentation]]+*[[Debate: Animal testing]]
- +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==

Current revision

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

"Animal Experiments". Updated August 17th, 2004 - "Scientists claim there are no differences in lab animals and humans that cannot be factored into tests."

Coalition for Medical Progress. FAQ - "Even if we share many genes our brains are totally different to animals. How can you find out anything about our brains from animal brains? There are differences, there are also similarities. Science rarely tries to mimic a whole human disease in an animal. Instead it focuses on one part of the disease that can be seen in the animal (Philip Connolly, CMP)"

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits