Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal.
Argument: Depriving prisoners a vote wrongly disenfranchises them
From Debatepedia
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 18:53, 19 June 2008 (edit) Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision (18:51, 16 June 2010) (edit) Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs) (→Parent debate) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Parent debate== | ==Parent debate== | ||
| - | *[[Debate:Prisoners right to vote]] | + | *[[Debate: Prisoners right to vote]] |
| - | + | ||
| ==Supporting quotations== | ==Supporting quotations== | ||
| [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/may/11/prisonsandprobation.election2001 Daniel Machover. "Prisoners too should voteToday's agenda". The Guardian. May 11, 2001] - There is a corrosive effect on a democracy when a certain group is banned from voting, especially if that group is already "unpopular", as with prisoners. | [http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2001/may/11/prisonsandprobation.election2001 Daniel Machover. "Prisoners too should voteToday's agenda". The Guardian. May 11, 2001] - There is a corrosive effect on a democracy when a certain group is banned from voting, especially if that group is already "unpopular", as with prisoners. | ||
Current revision
[Edit]
Parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting quotations
Daniel Machover. "Prisoners too should voteToday's agenda". The Guardian. May 11, 2001 - There is a corrosive effect on a democracy when a certain group is banned from voting, especially if that group is already "unpopular", as with prisoners.
