Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Animals are like vulnerable minorities that are voiceless to end abuses

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:09, 5 May 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 23:56, 6 May 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
Next diff →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Parent debate== ==Parent debate==
*[[Debate:Animal Experimentation]] *[[Debate:Animal Experimentation]]
 +
==Supporting quotations== ==Supporting quotations==
[http://www.helium.com/items/343668-cause-feelingskurt-cobaina-primary Randy Fairchild. "The Case Against Animal Testing". Helium] - "The real difference - the difference that makes a difference - in the instance of animals is that they cannot vote and protect themselves with laws and constitutional rights. Thus, there are no such laws prohibiting experimentation upon them. [http://www.helium.com/items/343668-cause-feelingskurt-cobaina-primary Randy Fairchild. "The Case Against Animal Testing". Helium] - "The real difference - the difference that makes a difference - in the instance of animals is that they cannot vote and protect themselves with laws and constitutional rights. Thus, there are no such laws prohibiting experimentation upon them.
Modern ethics holds that we should strive to protect the disadvantaged, especially when they are different, in an effort to battle natural temptations toward exploitation. Thus, we would enrich the world, respecting diversity." Modern ethics holds that we should strive to protect the disadvantaged, especially when they are different, in an effort to battle natural temptations toward exploitation. Thus, we would enrich the world, respecting diversity."
 +
 +
 +'''http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Harvey Paul Harvey], a famous American radio broadcaster for the ABC Radio Network''' - "Ever occur to you why some of us can be this much concerned with animals suffering? Because government is not. Why not? Animals don't vote."[http://www.quotegarden.com/a-rights.html]

Revision as of 23:56, 6 May 2008

Parent debate


Supporting quotations

Randy Fairchild. "The Case Against Animal Testing". Helium - "The real difference - the difference that makes a difference - in the instance of animals is that they cannot vote and protect themselves with laws and constitutional rights. Thus, there are no such laws prohibiting experimentation upon them. Modern ethics holds that we should strive to protect the disadvantaged, especially when they are different, in an effort to battle natural temptations toward exploitation. Thus, we would enrich the world, respecting diversity."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Harvey Paul Harvey], a famous American radio broadcaster for the ABC Radio Network - "Ever occur to you why some of us can be this much concerned with animals suffering? Because government is not. Why not? Animals don't vote."[1]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.