Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Animal testing may benefit human science, but costs human morals

From Debatepedia

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:16, 7 May 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Argument: Animal testing may benefit human science, but costs human character moved to Argument: Animal testing may benefit human science, but costs human morals)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 02:52, 7 May 2008 (edit)
Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(Supporting quotations)
Next diff →
Line 7: Line 7:
'''Mahatma Gandhi''' - "I abhor vivisection with my whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with innocent blood I count as of no consequence."[http://www.quotegarden.com/a-rights.html] '''Mahatma Gandhi''' - "I abhor vivisection with my whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with innocent blood I count as of no consequence."[http://www.quotegarden.com/a-rights.html]
 +
 +
 +'''Schopenhauer''' - "The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."[http://www.quotegarden.com/a-rights.html]

Revision as of 02:52, 7 May 2008

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

George Bernard Shaw - "Vivisection is a social evil because if it advances human knowledge, it does so at the expense of human character."[1]


Mahatma Gandhi - "I abhor vivisection with my whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with innocent blood I count as of no consequence."[2]


Schopenhauer - "The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality."[3]

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.