Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Affirm action wrongly considers race over econ/edu factors

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 04:29, 2 October 2007; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Extended argument and supporting evidence

  • The white "coal miner's son" against the wealthy black child:
    • Christopher Edley, the White House assistant put in charge of President Clinton's review of affirmative action policy in 1994-95 - "Imagine a college admissions committee trying to decide between the white [son] of an Appalachian coal miner's family and the African American son of a successful Pittsburgh neurosurgeon. Why should the black applicant get preference over the white applicant?" - Christopher Edley, Jr., Not All Black and White: Affirmative Action and American Values (New York: Hill and Wang, 1996), 132ff. Edley's example involved a coal miner's daughter; I've change the daughter to a son for expository purposes.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.