Argument: There is no alternative to animals in testing immunities

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Featured articles Upcoming features Contents guide getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Twitter Donate! Other resources Contact Internships Facebook group Useful links Link exchanges NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debate Digest: Teacher-student friendships on Facebook, Law school, Balanced budget amendment, US debt ceiling deal. Argument: There is no alternative to animals in testing immunities From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debate Debate: Animal testing [Edit] Supporting quotations Peter Doherty, Ph.D., 1996 Nobel Laureate and chair, Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital - "There is no alternative to the use of animals for analyzing the complexity of immunity. Progress in all areas off medicine is enormously enhanced by the new gene ""knockout"" and transgenic mouse technologies.""[1] Retrieved from "http://www.dbp.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_There_is_no_alternative_to_animals_in_testing_immunities"

Problem with the site?

Parent debate