Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: The Iraq War will be illegal after UN authorizations expire on January 1, 2009

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotes

  • Bruce Ackerman and Oona Hathaway. "The War's Expiration Date". Washington Post. April 5, 2008 - "U.S. military intervention is authorized under the second prong of the 2002 resolution. This authorizes the president to "enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq." This has allowed the Bush administration to satisfy American law by obtaining a series of resolutions authorizing the United States to serve as the head of the multinational force in Iraq.
But here's the rub. The most recent U.N. resolution expires on Dec. 31, and the administration has announced that it will not seek one for 2009. Instead, it is now negotiating a bilateral agreement with the Iraqi government to replace the U.N. mandate.
Whatever this agreement contains, it will not fill the legal vacuum. That's because the administration is not planning to submit this new agreement to Congress for its explicit approval. Since the Constitution gives the power to "declare war" to Congress, the president can't ignore the conditions imposed on him in 2002 without returning for a new grant of authority. He cannot substitute the consent of the Iraqi government for the consent of the U.S. Congress."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.