Personal tools

Argument: Rich pay bulk of taxes because they earn bulk of national income

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Comment on Ezra Klein's Blog in American Prospect - The cost of government should be funded in accord with the percentage of assets owned and earned. Here are increases in national debt for the past few years. Note, increasing national debt shows the full extent of deficit spending.

9/29/2006 $574,264,237,491.73

9/30/2005 $553,656,965,393.18

9/30/2004 $595,821,633,586.70

9/30/2003 $554,995,097,146.46

9/30/2002 $420,772,553,397.10

9/30/2001 $133,285,202,313.20

9/30/2000 $17,907,308,271.43

Here are the taxes paid by quintile.

Here is a pie chart of wealth distribution.

As you can see from this chart, the bottom 50% owns 2.6% of the wealth; they are therefore overtaxed because their tax burden is 3.4%. The top 10% own 69.9% and the remainder, the 40% between the top 10 and the bottom 50% own 27.4%. That totals 99.9% of American wealth. Note, the chart is dated 2001. Since then, the upper groups have gained wealth, the lower have lost.

There is a correlation between wealth owned and income earned, but note; there are families with great wealth and low income because the wealth is considered unearned: from stocks, bonds, and other sources aside from the weekly paypacket.

It is clear that the Federal taxes are too low by 575,000,000 in order to meet federal expenses and that the people owning America are drastically undertaxed because they are in no way paying their fair share, which is under 65% when it should be over 70%.

Therefore, all talk of the rich being overtaxed is bunk.

Robert J. Shapiro. "Flat Wrong: New Tax Schemes Can't Top Old Progressive Truths". Washington Post. 24 Mar. 1996 - Affluent people pay the bulk of federal taxes not because the system is sharply progressive, but mainly because they earn the bulk of all the income subject to tax.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits