Personal tools
 
Views

Argument: Private control of geoengineering projects has great risks

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting quotations

Alan Robock. "20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist. 2008: "15. Commercial control of technology. Who would end up controlling geoengineering systems? Governments? Private companies holding patents on proprietary technology? And whose benefit would they have at heart? These systems could pose issues analogous to those raised by pharmaceutical companies and energy conglomerates whose products ostensibly serve the public, but who often value shareholder profits over the public good."

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.